Multifocal arterial disease: clinical implications and management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Vascular disease often affects more than one territory. Atherosclerosis is a global disease affecting multiple organs/systems. Cardiovascular risk factors are associated with an increased risk for the development of arterial disease in all vascular beds but differ in their individual impacts for each vascular bed. We discuss the various options to identify and manage multifocal arterial disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Coronary artery disease may coexist with carotid artery stenosis, abdominal aortic aneurysms, and/or peripheral artery disease (PAD). Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and renal function impairment may complicate PAD. Recent studies have confirmed that patients with multivascular bed disease have higher risk than patients with monovascular disease. In addition to the specific surgical/endovascular therapeutic options available, aggressive medical treatment and vascular disease prevention strategies should be rigorously implemented to best manage the overall atherosclerotic burden. SUMMARY: A holistic approach is essential to reduce the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality rates of vascular patients. Preventive measures should complement surgical/endovascular procedures so as to improve outcomes.

Safety of urgent endarterectomy in acute non-disabling stroke patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: an international multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: International recommendations advocate that carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should be performed within 2 weeks from the index event in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis (sCAS) patients. However, there are controversial data regarding the safety of CEA performed during the first 2 days of ictus. The aim of this international, multicenter study was to prospectively evaluate the safety of urgent (0-2 days) in comparison to early (3-14 days) CEA in patients with sCAS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with non-disabling (modified Rankin Scale scores ≤2) acute ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack due to sCAS (≥70%) underwent urgent or early CEA at five tertiary-care stroke centers during a 6-year period. The primary outcome events included stroke, myocardial infarction or death during the 30-day follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 311 patients with sCAS underwent urgent (n = 63) or early (n = 248) CEA. The two groups did not differ in baseline characteristics with the exception of crescendo transient ischaemic attacks (21% in urgent vs. 7% in early CEA; P = 0.001). The 30-day rates of stroke did not differ (P = 0.333) between patients with urgent (7.9%; 95% confidence interval 3.1%-17.7%) and early (4.4%; 95% confidence interval 2.4%-7.9%) CEA. The mortality and myocardial infarction rates were similar between the two groups. The median length of hospitalization was shorter in urgent CEA [6 days (interquartile range 4-6) vs. 10 days (interquartile range 7-14); P < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight that urgent CEA performed within 2 days from the index event is related to a non-significant increase in the risk of peri-procedural stroke. The safety of urgent CEA requires further evaluation in larger datasets.

Cranial Nerve Injury After Carotid Endarterectomy: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Time Trends.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: To review the incidence of post-carotid endarterectomy (CEA) cranial nerve injury (CNI), and to evaluate the risk factors associated with increased CNI risk. METHODS: The study was a meta-analysis. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for CNIs after primary CEA. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for potential risk factors. A fixed-effects model or a random effects model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was used for non-heterogeneous and heterogeneous data, respectively. Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine the influence of publication year upon CNI rate. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles, published between 1970 and 2015, were included in the meta-analysis, corresponding to 20,860 CEAs. Meta-analysis revealed that the vagus nerve was the most frequently injured cranial nerve (pooled injury rate 3.99%, 95% CI 2.56-5.70), followed by the hypoglossal nerve (3.79%, 95% CI 2.73-4.99). Fewer than one seventh of these injuries are permanent (vagus nerve: 0.57% [95% CI 0.19-1.10]; hypoglossal nerve: 0.15% [95% CI 0.01-0.39]). A statistically significant influence of publication year on the vagus and hypoglossal nerve injury rate was found, with the injury rate having decreased from about 8% to 2% and 1%, respectively, over the last 35 years. Urgent procedures (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.21-2.10; p = .001), as well as return to the operating room for a neurological event or bleeding (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.35-3.61; p = .002) were associated with an increased risk of CNI, whereas no statistically significant association was found between CNIs and the type of anaesthesia, the use of a patch, redo operation, and the use of a shunt. CONCLUSION: The vagus nerve appears to be the most frequently injured cranial nerve after CEA, followed by the hypoglossal nerve, with only a small proportion of these injuries being permanent. The CNI rate has significantly decreased over the past 35 years to a point indicating that CNIs should not be considered a major influencing factor in the decision making process between CEA and stenting.

A Review of Open and Endovascular Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome of Benign Aetiology.

BACKGROUND: The widespread use of central venous catheters, ports, pacemakers, and defibrillators has increased the incidence of benign superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). This study aimed at reviewing the results of open and endovascular treatment of SVCS. METHOD: Medical literature databases were searched for relevant studies. Studies with more than five adult patients, reporting separate results for the SVC were included. Nine studies reported the results of endovascular treatment of SVCS including 136 patients followed up for a mean of 11-48 months. Causes of SVCS were central venous catheters and pacemakers (80.6%), mediastinal fibrosis (13.7%), and other (5.6%). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting was performed in 73.6%, PTA only in 17.3%, and thrombolysis, PTA, and stenting in 9%. Four studies reported the results of open repair of SVCS including 87 patients followed up between 30 months and 10.9 years. The causes were mediastinal fibrosis (58.4%), catheters and pacemakers (28.5%), and other (13%). Operations performed included a spiral saphenous interposition graft, other vein graft, PTFE graft, and human allograft. Thirteen patients required re-operations (15%) before discharge mainly for graft thrombosis. RESULTS: In the endovascular group technical success was 95.6%. Thirty day mortality was 0%. Regression of symptoms was reported in 97.3%. Thirty-two patients (26.9%) underwent 58 secondary procedures. In the open group the 30 day mortality was 0%. Symptom regression was reported in 93.5%. Twenty-four patients (28.4%) underwent a total of 33 secondary procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular is the first line treatment for SVCS caused by intravenous devices, whereas surgery is most often performed for mediastinal fibrosis. Both treatments show good results regarding regression of the symptoms and mid-term primary patency, with a significant incidence of secondary interventions.

Protamine Reduces Bleeding Complications without Increasing the Risk of Stroke after Carotid Endarterectomy: A Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of heparin reversal with protamine after completion of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), summarising the available data from both randomised and non-randomised studies. METHODS: The study was a meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated for the outcomes of stroke and wound haematoma among patients receiving or not receiving protamine after CEA. Meta-regression analysis was performed to examine whether the documented differences were modified by potentially meaningful patient related or procedure related predictors, namely publication year, general anesthesia used, number of patients treated, mean age (years), males, neurological symptoms, use of patch, and use of shunt. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis reporting on 3,817 patients receiving protamine after CEA and 6,070 patients not receiving protamine for heparin reversal. Only one study was randomised. A statistically significant reduction in wound haematoma requiring re-operation was recorded after heparin reversal with protamine in patients undergoing CEA (OR, 0.42, 95% CI, 0.22-0.80, p = .008). In contrast, no significant difference was observed in stroke rates between groups of patients that received and did not receive protamine (OR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.49-1.03, p = .07). Meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant effect mediated by the modifiers examined. CONCLUSION: On the basis of the available data, heparin reversal with protamine seems to reduce the risk of wound haematoma, without increasing the risk of procedural stroke. However, taking into account the limitations of the analysis, further studies are needed to increase the level of evidence provided by the current meta-analysis.

Haemodynamic Performance of Low Strength Below Knee Graduated Elastic Compression Stockings in Health, Venous Disease, and Lymphoedema.

OBJECTIVE: To test the in vivo haemodynamic performance of graduated elastic compression (GEC) stockings using air-plethysmography (APG) in healthy volunteers (controls) and patients with varicose veins (VVs), post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), or lymphoedema. Responsiveness data were used to determine which group benefited the most from GEC. METHODS: There were 12 patients per group compared using no compression, knee-length Class 1 (18-21 mmHg) compression, and Class 2 (23-32 mmHg) compression. Stocking/leg interface pressures (mmHg) were measured supine in two places using an air-sensor transducer. Stocking performance parameters, investigated before and after GEC, included the standard APG tests (working venous volume [wVV], venous filling index [VFI], venous drainage index [VDI], ejection fraction [EF]) and the occlusion plethysmography tests (incremental pressure causing the maximal increase in calf volume [IPMIV], outflow fraction [OF]). Results were expressed as median and interquartile range. RESULTS: Significant graduated compression was achieved in all four groups with higher interface pressures at the ankle. Only the VVs patients had a significant reduction in their wVV (without: 133 [109-146] vs. class1: 93 [74-113] mL) and the VFI (without: 4.6 [3-7.1] vs. class1: 3.1 [1.9-5] mL/s), both at p <.05. The IPMIV improved significantly in all groups except in the PTS group (p <.05). The OF improved only in the controls (without: 43 [38-51] vs. class1: 50 [48-53] %) and the VVs patients (without: 47 [39-58] vs. class1: 56 [50-64] %), both at p <.05. There were no significant differences in the VDI or the EF with GEC. Compression dose-response relationships were not observed. CONCLUSION: Patients with varicose veins improved the most, whereas those with PTS improved the least. Performance seemed to depend more on disease pathophysiology than compression strength. However, the lack of responsiveness to compression strength may be related to the low external pressures used. Stocking performance tests may have value in selecting those patients who benefit most from compression.

The May-Husni Procedure: A Reappraisal.

OBJECTIVES: The May-Husni procedure is a rarely used saphenofemoral venous bypass because of the small number of patients with post-thrombotic segmental femoral vein obstruction alone and the lack of validated selection criteria. There are only a few institutional series reporting the use of this technique. The purpose of this report is to present the author's experience and critically review the literature. METHODS: Within a 13 year period 12 patients with venous claudication, skin pigmentation, and severe pain and swelling of their legs underwent the May-Husni procedure. Their median age was 57 years (41-69 years). Imaging showed segmental venous obstruction of the femoral vein in all patients and poor or no inflow from the deep femoral vein. Two patients were lost to follow up and the remaining 10 patients were reviewed with a median follow up of 60 months (26-72 months). RESULTS: The saphenopopliteal bypass remained patent in all patients at follow up. The development of reflux of the saphenous conduit in four patients did not affect the clinical improvement. Venous claudication resolved, hyper-pigmentation improved, and pain was relieved in all patients. Recanalization of the femoral vein 3 years following thrombosis was followed by recurrence of the post-thrombotic symptoms in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that a highly selected subgroup of patients with severe symptomatic post-thrombotic syndrome secondary to chronic segmental obstruction of the femoral vein do well after the May-Husni procedure. In order to refine the criteria for the selection of patients who may benefit from this operation, there is a need for more studies that use a combination of hemodynamic and validated scales that diagnose and grade the severity of post-thrombotic syndrome.

Long-term Mortality in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Implications for Statin Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies with asymptomatic carotid patients on best medical management have shown that the annual risk of stroke has decreased to approximately 1%. There is no evidence that a similar decrease in mortality has occurred. In addition, the intensity of statin therapy for these patients has not yet been determined. The aims of this review were to determine (a) the reported long-term all-cause and cardiac-related mortality in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) > 50%, (b) whether there has been a decrease in mortality in recent years, (c) the available methods of mortality risk stratification, and (d) whether the latest ACC/AHA guidelines on the treatment of serum lipids can be applied to this group of patients. METHODS: Systematic review of PubMed, EuroPubMed, and Cochrane Library and meta-analysis using random effects for pooled proportions were performed regarding long-term all-cause and cardiac-related mortality and the associated risk factors in ACS patients. The last day for literature search was October 30, 2014. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were retrieved reporting 5-year all-cause mortality in 11,391 patients with ACS >50%. The 5-year cumulative all-cause mortality across all 17 studies was 23.6% (95% CI 20.50-26.80). Twelve additional studies, reporting both all-cause and cardiac mortality with a minimum of 2 year follow-up and involving 4,072 patients were identified. Of the 930 deaths reported, 589 (62.9%; 95% CI 58.81-66.89) were cardiac-related. This translates into an average cardiac-related mortality of 2.9% per year. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause and cardiac mortality in ACS patients are very high. Although risk stratification is possible, most patients are classified as high risk. In view of this high risk, aggressive statin therapy is indicated if the new ACC/AHA guidelines on serum lipids are to be adhered to.

Quantitation of reflux and outflow obstruction in patients with CVD and correlation with clinical severity.

AIM: Chronic venous disease (CVD) is the result of venous reflux, obstruction or a combination of both. So far, attempts to correlate venous hemodynamic measurements with symptoms and signs of CVD have produced poor to moderate results, probably because of lack of methods to quantitate obstruction and combine measurements of reflux and obstruction. Our hypothesis is that the combination of quantitative measurements of (a) overall reflux (superficial and deep) and (b) overall outflow resistance i.e. including the collateral circulation would provide a hemodynamic index that should be related to the severity of the disease. METHODS: Twenty-five limbs with chronic venous disease and 1 limb from a healthy volunteer (VCSS 0-13) were studied. The clinical CEAP classification was C0 in one limb, C1 in 2 limbs, C2 in 10 limbs, C3 in 3 limbs, C4 in 1 limb, C5 in 6 limbs and C6 in 3 limbs. Air-plethysmography was used to measure reflux (VFI in mL/s) when the subject changed position from horizontal to standing. Subsequently, with the subject horizontal and the foot elevated 15 cm, simultaneous recordings of pressure and volume were made on release of a proximal thigh cuff inflated to 70 mmHg. Pressure change was recorded with a needle in the foot and volume change with air-plethysmography. Flow (Q in mL/min) was calculated at intervals of 0.1 seconds from tangents on the volume outflow curve. Outflow resistance (R) was calculated at 0.1 second intervals by dividing pressure by the corresponding flow (R=P/Q). R increased markedly at pressures lower than 25 mmHg due to decrease in vein cross-sectional area, so resistance at 25 mmHg (R25) was used in this study. RESULTS: In a multivariable linear regression analysis with VCSS as the dependent variable, both VFI and R25 were independent predictors (P<0.001). Using the constant (0.595) and regression coefficients, the regression equation provided a Hemodynamic Index (HI) or estimated VCSS=0.595 + (VFI x 0.41) + (R25 x 98). Thus, HI could be calculated for every patient by substituting VFI and R25 in the equation. HI or calculated VCSS was linearly related to the observed VCSS (r=0.86). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that the combination of quantitative measurements of reflux and outflow resistance provide a hemodynamic index which is linearly related to the VCSS. These findings need to be confirmed in larger series.

Quantifying the degree graduated elastic compression stockings enhance venous emptying.

OBJECTIVES: Graduated elastic compression (GEC) stockings reduce reflux and venous volume but their performance on augmenting venous return is unproven. The aim of this study was to quantify the ability of stockings to increase venous outflow from the leg. DESIGN: A prospective study comparing venous emptying without compression, versus class 1 (18-21 mmHg) and class 2 (23-32 mmHg) compression, using air-plethysmography (APG). METHODS: The right legs of 20 healthy subjects were studied supine. A 12-cm thigh-cuff was inflated in 10 mmHg steps from 0 to 80 mmHg while the corresponding increase in calf volume was recorded using the APG sensor calf-cuff. At the 80 mmHg plateau, the thigh-cuff was released suddenly to measure the unrestricted venous emptying. Venous return was assessed by: (a) identifying the incremental thigh-cuff pressure causing the maximal incremental increase in calf volume (IPMIV); (b) measuring the percentage reduction in calf volume in 1 second following thigh-cuff release - outflow fraction (OF); (c) time to empty 90% of the venous volume - venous emptying time (VET90). RESULTS: Median and inter-quartile range (IQR) baseline values of IPMIV, OF, and VET90 without compression were 20 mmHg (range: 20-30 mmHg), 44% (39-50%) and 13 seconds (8.8-15.9 seconds), respectively. These improved significantly with all stockings. The application of any stocking raised the median IPMIV by 30 mmHg. The change from a class 2 stocking compared with no stocking versus the change from a class 1 stocking to no stocking had a more pronounced effect (p < .005). After sudden thigh-cuff deflation, the venous emptying was 41-45% greater and 9-10 seconds faster with all stockings (p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to quantify the venous return of below-knee GEC stockings. Assessments of stockings in augmenting venous return may be of use as a way of optimising compression for individual patients unresponsive to standard conservative treatment.

Venous filling time using air-plethysmography correlates highly with great saphenous vein reflux time using duplex.

OBJECTIVES: Venous filling time (VFT90) is the time taken to reach 90% of the venous volume in the calf. It is recorded by air-plethysmography (APG(®)) and is assumed to measure global venous reflux duration. However, this has never been confirmed by duplex. The aim of the study was to compare VFT on APG to venous reflux time/duration (RT) measured simultaneously with duplex on the same patients. METHOD: Twenty-six consecutive patients, M:F = 16:10, age (25-78), C1 = 1, C2 = 4, C3 = 8, C4a = 6, C4b = 4, C5 = 2, C6 = 1, underwent simultaneous APG with duplex. The venous filling index (VFI, mL/second), VFT90 (seconds), great saphenous vein (GSV) RT on duplex, averaged thigh GSV diameter and thigh length (length) between the APG sensor air-cuff and duplex transducer were recorded. The VFT100 was calculated by VFT90/0.9. The additional time taken to fill the thigh was achieved using the VFI, length and deep vein diameter (d), to determine the corrected reflux duration: CRD = VFT100 + (length × πd(2)/4 (1/VFI)). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients are presented. One patient with very mild reflux (VFT90 = 55.9 seconds) had an indeterminate endpoint on duplex and was excluded. The median (range) VFI and GSV diameter was 4.9(1.3-15.5) mL/second and 7(4-17) mm, respectively. The VFT90 and VFT100 both correlated with RT on duplex (Spearman, P < 0.0005) at: r = 0.933, r(2) linear = 0.72 and r = 0.933, r(2) linear = 0.68, respectively. The median (interquartile range) filling time with VFT90 was less than the duplex RT at 24 (16.9) versus 28 (20) seconds respectively, P < 0.0005 (Wilcoxon). The median percentage underestimation improved from 24% to 16% and then 4% using the VFT90, VFT100 and CRD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to compare APG parameters with duplex by performing simultaneous measurements. There was an excellent correlation between the VFT90 versus duplex RT, thereby comparing reverse flow in a single superficial vein against the legs overall venous haemodynamic status. These tests can both be used in the quantification of reflux.

Responsiveness of individual questions from the venous clinical severity score and the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: The venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) improve after treating chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). The aim was to examine how and why they improve by evaluating the change in each individual question. METHODS: This was an analysis on prospectively collected data from a clinical study on 100 patients (58% female) with CVI (C2 = 34, C3 = 14, C4a = 29, C4b = 9, C5 = 7, C6 = 7) who were randomized to endovenous laser ablation (n = 50) or foam sclerotherapy (n = 50). The change scores (performance) of each question of the VCSS (questions 1-10) and the AVVQ (questions 1-13) were calculated by subtracting the score at three weeks, and three months, from the pre-treatment score. RESULTS: Both the median, interquartile range (IQR), VCSS and the AVVQ scores improved from 6 (4) and 21.4 (15.1) at baseline to 3 (4) and 18.6 (12.1) at three weeks (P < 0.0005, P = 0.031) to 2 (3) and 8.8 (13.6) at three months, (P < 0.0005, P < 0.0005), respectively. The performance of the first three questions of the VCSS (pain, extent of varicosities, oedema) were the most contributory to the overall score. Questions 5, 7, 8, 9 on ulceration improved the most individually but did not contribute significantly to the overall score. Questions 5, 9 of the AVVQ on stocking use and ulceration failed to contribute statistically to the overall improvement at three months. CONCLUSION: The majority of the individual questions of the VCSS and AVVQ responded to change. However, the cause of a poor response was multifactorial with statistical dilution playing a significant role. Stratification of patients according to ulceration may allow better comparisons.

Interim results on abolishing reflux alongside a randomized clinical trial on laser ablation with phlebectomies versus foam sclerotherapy.

AIM: The early results of a randomised clinical trial comparing local anaesthesia endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with concurrent phlebectomies versus ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) into the great saphenous vein (GSV) revealed that laser was more expensive but the results on abolition of reflux were similar. The interim results at 15 month follow-up are reported. METHODS: Evaluations included ultrasound, the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), the Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) and the saphenous treatment score (STS). The global absence of reflux defined technical success. Adjuvant sclerotherapy to areas of reflux was administered on patient choice. RESULTS: Occlusion of the GSV was more effective with EVLA at 42/44 (95.5%) versus 31/46 (67.4%) for UGFS. However both techniques were equally effective at abolishing global venous reflux. The number of legs (N.=100) with total reflux abolition, above-knee, below-knee or combined reflux and loss to follow-up was 18, 6, 12, 8, 6 with EVLA and 20, 8, 11, 7, 4 with UGFS, respectively. The VCSS, AVVQ and STS reduced compared to baseline (P<0.0005), but there was no statistical difference between the groups. The AVVQ remained unchanged between 3-15 months (P=0.601). Also during this time, 19/46(41%) UGFS versus 9/44(20%) EVLA legs received adjuvant treatment (2.1 times increase). However, overall, adjuvant foam was given 4.7 times more frequently in the UGFS patients. CONCLUSION: EVLA and UGFS are equally effective at abolishing global venous reflux with overall success of 41% and 43%, respectively. The high reflux rate was not related to deterioration in quality of life indicating that this reflux was largely asymptomatic.

Reflux time estimation on air-plethysmography may stratify patients with early superficial venous insufficiency.

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that quantification of haemodynamic parameters of venous disease may complement clinical assessment and may help identify a group of patients with severe venous disease or alternatively patients with early venous disease. However, there has been very little work to prove this hypothesis. The venous filling index (VFI) of air-plethysmography (APG) can quantify severity and treatment effect but has limited discriminatory value. However, the components of the VFI, total venous volume (VV) and time to reach 90% of VV (VFT90), have never been fully studied. The aim was to investigate the contribution of VV and VFT90 to an elevated VFI and determine their relationship to great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter and clinical severity scoring. METHOD: Ninety-three consecutive patients/legs (22-78 years) with primary GSV reflux (>0.5 seconds) awaiting endovenous treatment were recruited. CEAP (clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements) assessments were: 33 (35.5%) C2, 14 (15.0%) C3, 29 (31.2%) C4a, 5 (5.4%) C4b, 7 (7.5%) C5 and 5 (5.4%) C6. The median venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was 6 (2-20) and the averaged GSV diameter at three sites was 7.5 mm (4-12). The VFI, VV and VFT90 were recorded using APG. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the VV and the VFT90 (r = -0.103, P = 0.324). The VFI, VV and VFT90 significantly correlated (P < 0.0005, Spearman) with the GSV diameter: r = 0.623, r = 0.567, r = -0.432, respectively, and the C of CEAP (P < 0.05): r = 0.4, r = 0.225, r = -0.343, respectively. None of the 25 (26.9%) patients with a VFT90 > 25 seconds were among the 17 (18.3%) patients in categories C4b-6 or with a VCSS > 9 (P = 0.005, Fisher's exact test, corrected odds ratio: 17.3). CONCLUSIONS: The VFT90 complements the VFI as a marker of severe superficial venous insufficiency. However, in contrast to the VFI, it may have discriminatory value in stratifying patients with early disease into two groups based on the severity of haemodynamic impairment.